Evolution of Fetal Growth in Symptomatic Sars-Cov-2 Pregnancies.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 is a viral disease with potentially devastating effects. Observational studies of pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 report an increased risk for FGR. This study utilizes data from a prospective SARS-CoV-2 registry in pregnancy, investigating the progression of fetuses to fetal growth restriction (FGR) at birth following maternal SARS-CoV-2 and evaluating the hypothesis of whether the percentage of SGA at birth is increased after maternal SARS-CoV-2 taking into account the time interval between infection and birth. MATERIALS & METHODS: CRONOS is a prospective German registry enrolling pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during their pregnancy. SARS-CoV-2 symptoms, pregnancy- and delivery-specific information were recorded. The data evaluated in this study range from March 2020 until August 2021. Women with SARS-CoV-2 were divided into three groups according to the time of infection/symptoms to delivery: Group I<2 weeks, Group II 2-4 weeks, and Group III>4 weeks. FGR was defined as estimated and/or birth weight<10% ile, appropriate for gestational age (AGA) was within 10 and 90%ile, and large for gestational age (LGA) was defined as fetal or neonatal weight>90%ile. RESULTS: Data for a total of 2,650 SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women were available. The analysis was restricted to symptomatic cases that delivered after 24+0 weeks of gestation. Excluding those cases with missing values for estimated fetal weight at time of infection and/or birth weight centile, 900 datasets remained for analyses. Group I consisted of 551 women, Group II of 112 women, and Group III of 237 women. The percentage of changes from AGA to FGR did not differ between groups. However, there was a significantly higher rate of large for gestational age (LGA) newborns at the time of birth compared to the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Group III (p=0.0024), respectively. CONCLUSION: FGR rates did not differ between symptomatic COVID infections occurring within 2 weeks and>4 weeks before birth. On the contrary, it presented a significant increase in LGA pregnancies in Group III. However, in this study population, an increase in the percentage of LGA may be attributed to pandemic measures and a reduction in daily activity.

Multiple Gestation as a Risk Factor for SARS-CoV-2-Associated Adverse Maternal Outcome: Data From the COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS).

Introduction: Studies have shown that pregnant women with COVID-19 have a higher risk of intensive care unit admission and invasive mechanical ventilation support than non-pregnant women. Pregnancy-associated physiological changes in respiratory function may contribute to the elevated risk. Alteration in lung volumes and capacities are attributed to the mechanical impediment caused by the growing fetus. Multiple pregnancies may therefore compromise functional lung capacity earlier than singleton pregnancies and contribute to severe respiratory symptoms of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: A total of 5514 women with a symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy registered in the COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study were included. The COVID-19-related adverse maternal outcomes were compared in 165 multiple versus 5349 singleton pregnancies. Combined adverse maternal outcome was defined as presence of COVID-19-related hospitalization and/or pneumonia and/or oxygen administration and/or transfer to ICU and/or death. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: The frequency of dyspnea, likelihood of developing dyspnea in a defined pregnancy week and duration of the symptomatic phase of the COVID-19 infection did not differ between the two groups. On average, COVID-19-related combined adverse outcome occurred earlier during pregnancy in women expecting more than one child than in singleton pregnancies. The overall incidence of singular and combined COVID-19-associated adverse maternal outcomes was not significantly different between groups. However, regression analysis revealed that multiple gestation, preconceptional BMI > 30 kg/m 2 and gestational age correlated significantly with an increased risk of combined adverse maternal outcome. Conversely, maternal age and medically assisted reproduction were not significant risk factors for combined adverse maternal outcome. Conclusion: Our data show that multiple gestation alone is a risk factor for COVID-19-associated combined adverse maternal outcome. Moreover, severe courses of COVID-19 in women expecting more than one child are observed earlier in pregnancy than in singleton pregnancies.

Incarceration of the Gravid Uterus - a Rare Condition not to be Missed.

BACKGROUND: Incarceration of a gravid uterus (IGU) is a rare manifestation in obstetrics that may be associated with serious complications. CASE: We report on a 29-year-old patient at 34+2 weeks' gestation who presented with HELLP syndrome. IGU had been initially diagnosed in our department at 23+6 weeks' gestation. Urgent cesarean section was performed taking into account the specific characteristics of IGU. A healthy premature child was born. With the prior knowledge of IGU no complications during delivery occurred and mother and child had favorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: IGU is a rare condition in pregnancy that should not be overlooked. Early diagnosis and treatment of IGU can prevent serious complications to the mother and child during pregnancy and delivery. In this report, we discuss the specific peculiarities of an incarcerated uterus that need to be considered in this regard. HINTERGRUND: Ein Uterus incarceratus ist eine seltene Manifestation in der Geburtshilfe, welche mit schwerwiegenden Komplikationen einhergehen kann. FALL: Wir berichten über eine 29-jährige Patientin, die sich mit 34+2 Schwangerschaftswochen (SSW) mit einem HELLP-Syndrom in unserer Klinik vorgestellt hat. Die Erstdiagnose des inkarzerierten Uterus wurde in unserer Klinik mit 23+6 SSW gestellt. Aufgrund unserer Vorkenntnis über diese Diagnose konnte nun die dringend indizierte Sectio caesarea unter Berücksichtigung der spezifischen Merkmale in modifizierter Technik durchgeführt werden. Es wurde ein gesundes Frühgeborenes geboren. Es traten während der Geburt keine Komplikationen auf und Mutter und Kind hatten einen günstigen Verlauf. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Ein Uterus incarceratus ist eine seltene Manifestation in der Schwangerschaft, welche nicht übersehen werden sollte. Eine frühzeitige Diagnose und Behandlung kann schwerwiegende Komplikationen für Mutter und Kind während der Schwangerschaft und unter der Geburt verhindern. Wir diskutieren die spezifischen Besonderheiten eines Uterus incarceratus, die hierbei zu berücksichtigen sind.

Correction: Multiple Gestation as a Risk Factor for SARS-CoV-2-Associated Adverse Maternal Outcome: Data From the COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS).

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-2196-6224.].

[COVID-19 in Pregnancy - a Risk for the Unborn Child?] / COVID-19 in der Schwangerschaft: Ursache für eine intrakranielle Blutung bei einem Frühgeborenen?

Geburtskliniken werden zunehmend mit an Covid-19 erkrankten Schwangeren konfrontiert. Dies stellt Geburtshelfer vor große Herausforderungen, da einige Fragestellungen noch nicht ausreichend wissenschaftlich erforscht sind. Über Covid-19 während der Schwangerschaft und seine Auswirkungen auf das ungeborene und neugeborene Kind ist nicht viel bekannt.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: results from the COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS).

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus is one of the most frequent pregnancy complications with a global prevalence of 13.4% in 2021. Pregnant women with COVID-19 and gestational diabetes mellitus are 3.3 times more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit than women without gestational diabetes mellitus. Data on the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether gestational diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for adverse maternal and fetal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: The COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study is a registry-based multicentric prospective observational study from Germany and Linz, Austria. Pregnant women with clinically confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled between April 3, 2020, and August 24, 2021, at any stage of pregnancy. Obstetricians and neonatologists of 115 hospitals actively provided data to the COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study. For collecting data, a cloud-based electronic data platform was developed. Women and neonates were observed until hospital discharge. Information on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medical history, COVID-19-associated symptoms and treatments, pregnancy, and birth outcomes were entered by the local sites. Information on the periconceptional body mass index was collected. A primary combined maternal endpoint was defined as (1) admission to an intensive care unit (including maternal mortality), (2) viral pneumonia, and/or (3) oxygen supplementation. A primary combined fetal and neonatal endpoint was defined as (1) stillbirth at ≥24 0/7 weeks of gestation, (2) neonatal death ≤7 days after delivery, and/or (3) transfer to a neonatal intensive care unit. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the modulating effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on the defined endpoints. RESULTS: Of the 1490 women with COVID-19 (mean age, 31.0±5.2 years; 40.7% nulliparous), 140 (9.4%) were diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus; of these, 42.9% were treated with insulin. Overall, gestational diabetes mellitus was not associated with an adverse maternal outcome (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.57). However, in women who were overweight or obese, gestational diabetes mellitus was independently associated with the primary maternal outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-5.07). Women who were overweight or obese with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin treatment were found to have an increased risk of a severe course of COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-6.73). Adverse maternal outcomes were more common when COVID-19 was diagnosed with or shortly after gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis than COVID-19 diagnosis before gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis (19.6% vs 5.6%; P<.05). Maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal preconception body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 increased the risk of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.18). Furthermore, overweight and obesity (irrespective of gestational diabetes mellitus status) were influential factors for the maternal (adjusted odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.75) and neonatal (adjusted odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.48) primary endpoints compared with underweight or normal weight. CONCLUSION: Gestational diabetes mellitus, combined with periconceptional overweight or obesity, was independently associated with a severe maternal course of COVID-19, especially when the mother required insulin and COVID-19 was diagnosed with or after gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis. These combined factors exhibited a moderate effect on neonatal outcomes. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus and a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 were a particularly vulnerable group in the case of COVID-19.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID-19 after medically assisted reproduction: results from the prospective COVID-19-Related Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcome Study.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 infections in pregnancy have been associated with maternal morbidity, admission to intensive care, and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, stillbirth, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It is unclear whether medically assisted reproduction additionally affects maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of medically assisted reproduction on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19 in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1485 women with COVID-19 registered in the COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (a multicentric, prospective, observational cohort study) were included. The maternal and neonatal outcomes in 65 pregnancies achieved with medically assisted reproduction and in 1420 spontaneously conceived pregnancies were compared. We used univariate und multivariate (multinomial) logistic regressions to estimate the (un)adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for adverse outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of COVID-19-associated adverse outcomes (eg, pneumonia, admission to intensive care, and death) was not different in women after conceptions with COVID-19 than in women after medically assisted reproduction pregnancies. Yet, the risk of obstetrical and neonatal complications was higher in pregnancies achieved through medically assisted reproduction. However, medically assisted reproduction was not the primary risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes including pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes mellitus, cervical insufficiency, peripartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, or admission to neonatal intensive care. Maternal age, multiple pregnancies, nulliparity, body mass index >30 (before pregnancy) and multiple gestation contributed differently to the increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with COVID-19 independent of medically assisted reproduction. CONCLUSION: Although women with COVID-19 who conceived through fertility treatment experienced a higher incidence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal complications than women with spontaneous conceptions, medically assisted reproduction was not the primary risk factor.

Cytokines in noninvasively obtained amniotic fluid as predictors of fetal inflammatory response syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine inflammation and/or infection is frequently present, can lead to fetal inflammatory response syndrome, and is associated with adverse neonatal outcome. Clinical decision making requires balancing the potential benefits of pregnancy prolongation against the risk of intrauterine infection. Diagnostic tests in maternal serum are of moderate prediction value and amniocentesis is an invasive procedure. Therefore, markers obtained noninvasively would be helpful in patients with expectant management. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive values of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in vaginal secretions for fetal inflammatory response syndrome and/or histologic funisitis and for adverse neonatal outcome in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective multicenter case-control study, vaginal secretions were sampled daily with a noninvasive method from 99 women with preterm premature rupture of membranes and expectant management. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α were measured by 2 different immunoassays (an automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay and a lateral flow immunoassay). After delivery, patients were divided into a control or a fetal inflammatory response syndrome group according to neonatal interleukin-6 in cord plasma and/or the presence of funisitis. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed and prediction models were developed by calculating receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Gestational age at delivery was lower and latency period was longer in the fetal inflammatory response syndrome group compared to the control group. The strongest risk factor for composite adverse neonatal outcome was fetal inflammatory response syndrome (odds ratio, 2.48; confidence interval, 1.40-4.38). The median concentrations of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in vaginal secretions were significantly higher in the fetal inflammatory response group compared to the control group in both immunoassays (P < .001). The area under the curve of the clinical reference model (including common clinical parameters) was 0.66. Adding interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α into the model improved the area under the curve to 0.92 (in both assays, interleukin-6 IMMULITE and QuickLine); 0.87 (tumor necrosis factor-α IMMULITE) and 0.94 (tumor necrosis factor-α QuickLine), respectively. CONCLUSION: The strongest risk factor for worse neonatal outcome (composite neonatal outcome) was fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α seem to be good predictors for fetal inflammatory response syndrome and for histologic funisitis and may improve the clinical management of patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. The noninvasive technique of sampling amniotic fluid from vaginal secretions facilitates daily measurements and bedside assessment of cytokines and is in this respect preferable to invasive amniocentesis.

PP052. Diagnosis of pre-eclampsia and prediction of time to delivery in women with suspected pre-eclampsia presenting before 36 weeks' gestation.

INTRODUCTION: The pro-angiogenic factor PlGF has an important role in the development and maintenance of the placenta. Incomplete remodelling of uterine spiral arteries is associated with placental oxidative stress, placental dysfunction, and the complications of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Abnormally low PlGF levels identify placental dysfunction and an increased risk for pregnancy complication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between abnormally low PlGF concentration, a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia or IUGR, and a short interval to delivery. METHODS: We recruited a total of 45 pregnant women with suspected pre-eclampsia between 23+0 to 36+0 weeks of gestation. The concentration of PlGF was measured in maternal EDTA plasma samples (Alere, Triage® PlGF), a rapid assay using monoclonal antibodies raised against free PlGF. RESULTS: Pre-eclampsia was diagnosed clinically in 25 women. PlGF was abnormal (<100pg/mL) in all 25 women (100% sensitivity). Eighteen women (72%) had a PlGF level <12pg/mL (very abnormal) and, of these, 14 (78%) had IUGR and a birthweight below the 10th centile. The mean time to delivery in women with a PlGF level <12pg/mL was 7.5 days (0-18d), compared with 23 days (0-67d) for a PlGF level in the range ⩾12<100pg/mL, in agreement with data recently reported by Chappell [1]. CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity of PlGF for pre-eclampsia with/without IUGR and its strong prediction of time-to-delivery allows PlGF to be a valuable diagnostic tool. PlGF has the potential to remove the uncertainty in clinical decision-making in women with suspected pre-eclampsia.